I can see it now:
CONTENT WARNING: This game delves into L-functions and other analytical continuations in the complex plane of elliptic differential operators. Play at your own risk.
I can see it now:
CONTENT WARNING: This game delves into L-functions and other analytical continuations in the complex plane of elliptic differential operators. Play at your own risk.
Brb, writing the raunchy maths IF piece “Critical Strip Tease”.
That’s it, Hanon won the Internet. We can all go home now.
WARNING This game suggests that the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are located on the line x = 1/2. I have discovered a marvelous proof of this, which this game is too short to contain, mostly because of all the explict sexual content.
I joked about an X-rated parody called A Beauty Warm and Voluptuous way back when, but never took it beyond the title. Maybe you’re the author this idea needs!
Warning: This game contains sexy primes and explicit equations. Also, the integral of e^x and the numbers 2110593 and 5318008.
can the math jokes be split off
concur and agree, noticing that the IT math joke, the number 69,105 is NOT duly cited during these jokes, hence more OT than else…
Best regards from Italy,
dott. Piergiorgio.
I don’t have a way to explain to the people around me why I started abruptly cackling like a madwoman lmao. 10/10
This took me a minute, but that’s really clever
Of course they can. What else do I exist for except to sort out everyone’s conversational whims? [beats the forum with the official cudgel] NO. SIDE. HUMOR. IN. OFFICIAL. THREADS.
[bows and scrapes back into the darkness, kicking the cape out of the way since I’m out of glitter.]
This reminds me of the college classmate who would always refer derisively to one guy who always asked perceived-to-be-dumb questions in some math class as “bijection boy”, which I’m sure is riffing on an entirely innocent term but sounds entertainingly dirty.
As a person highly prone to injecting questionable humor at inappropriate times, I strenuously object.
They just meant he was both an “injection boy” and a “surjection boy.”
“I object! But I’m happy to go either way…”
Intersection Homology & Perverse Sheaves (with Applications to Singularities) might as well be the title of my memoir.
I appreciate everyone has their limit (and colimits). This kernel of conversation should be split from the exact sequence of discussion, which makes it easier to identify the semi-direct product of interest.
Runs from the cudgel
The Yoneda embedding
The following needs content warning because it can melt your brain if you delve too deep into it (like Lovecraftian horror)
Here, instead of the two I know, have some mathematician jokes: