I have a podcast about how people use computers and I want to make an episode about the IF community, specifically indie and amateur IF from the 1990s onward (i.e. not Infocom).
(My podcast is at https://hamster.dance/podcast/ in case you want to know more about it.)
I want to crowdsource this question: what, for you, are defining/seminal IF works? What moments in the evolution of the community have been pivotal?
âDitch Day Drifterâ demonstrated that a development system available to hobbyists, TADS, could create games on a par with Infocom.
âCursesâ did the same for a development system, Inform, which was free.
âAnchorheadâsâ competence and Lovecraftian appeal attracted interest from those outside the hobby community.
âArrivalâ was the first polished game with sounds, music, and illustrations since Legend Entertainment.
âSpider and Webâ reminded a community that was talking about puzzleless IF that puzzles were story in IF.
âMetamorphosesâ was an early simulationist game by one of the most prolific designers and essayists in the community.
âHadean Landsâ demonstrated that enough interest in IF remained to fund a large game from a notable amateur designer.
I agree with those already shared.
Iâd say that âA Change in the Weatherâ was perhaps the game that really influenced authors to make literary/story-focused games, even before Photopia which took it to full focus on the story without many puzzles.
Galatea of course really affected conversation.
Rameses isnât talked about a lot now but generated an enormous amount of discussion for its complete lack of agency.
Slouching Towards Bedlam was perhaps the first game with real player agency resulting in very different endings. Emily Short talked about it a lot when it first came out.
In recent years, Lime Ergot inspired a lot of limited parser games.
If youâre doing non-parser games, Howling Dogs popularized Twine in IFComp and My Fatherâs Long Long Legs helped with public recognition of the format. Choice of the Dragon kicked off the last 10 years of Choicescript games.
Counterfeit Monkey (2012) is one of the rarest of IF pieces that takes such full advantage of the text parser that it creates an experience impossible in any other medium or format.
Also, I would say Inform 7 gave authors more on the âwriterlyâ side than the âcoderlyâ side the ability to create adventures of technical quality equal to Infocom. This made possible due to the fact it compiles source text that is easy to write and read in natural (almost! with caveats!) English directly to Inform 6 code.
Strong agreement with what everybody above has said â the one point of emphasis Iâd draw is that if youâre considering doing a broad look at IF, the rise of Twine and choice-based games feels like it dwarfs pretty much anything else. While there was obviously a lot of evolution of parser IF in terms of production, design, and the community, the trajectory of that evolution is much more predictable and incremental by way of comparison.
In terms of other games that might be worth thinking about:
Pick Up the Phone Booth And Die pioneered a sort of anarchic, one-joke game that I think still has some resonance.
Gourmet to my mind pioneered farce as a valid IF genre.
There are many many IF/CRPG mash-ups â Iâm not sure which were the first, or frankly whether any have been fully successful, but looking at some examples like Reliques of Tolti-Aph or Kerkerkruip (I am sure I misspelled that) could be fun.
Speaking of Victor Gijsbers, De Baron was influential in pushing anti-heroic, or even straight villainous, protagonists.
The wordplay subgenre of IF is also a fun one, and traceable from Nord and Bert to Ad Verbum to Counterfeit Monkey.
You did not!
I think the phrasing of this question is a bit ambiguous. Are you interested in games of historical importance to the IF community, where the game changed the course of a (still rather small, even today) community of IF creators? Or are you instead interested in really great IF games worth sharing with your listeners? Or are you interested in games that sparked a lot of community discussion?
If youâre âjustâ looking for great games, youâd do well to just hit up the IFDB Top 100. (Beware, this page takes a minute to load. Just be patient.) https://ifdb.tads.org/viewlist?id=k7rrytlz3wihmx2o
Many of the greatest IF games of all time, games at the very top of the IFDB Top 100, were unprecedented when they launched, and widely praised, but nobody really followed in their footsteps either. Here Iâm thinking especially of some of the largest and most technically complicated works of IF, where the cost of following in their footsteps would be extremely high.
I would include these games on the list of great works that did not change the way everyone else made IF:
Each one of those games could have kicked off a whole genre of games following in their footsteps (letter-remover games, auto-completing recipe games, generous-parser games), but didnât.
By comparison, each game that did change the way we built IF was usually the game that launched an IF platform. This isnât necessarily the platformâs first game, or even the first ârealâ game (as opposed to a technology demo), but, as I like to put it, the first âadmirableâ game for that platform, the game that made people say, âI really like this game, and I would like to make another game just like it. How did the author(s) make it?â
For those, I would point toward these:
All of these games were well received, but IMO none of them are the very best each platform has to offer. (It would be rather depressing if the game that launched a platform was the best game anyone could ever make on that platform!)
As for kicking off discussion, Iâd point to Depression Quest (one of the major flashpoints of Gamergate in 2014), howling dogs, De Baron, Photopia, Rameses, Aisle. See also the IF Theory Reader particularly â10 Years of IF: 1994-2004.â
Probably the biggest historical turns in the communityâs discussion coincide with changes in the way we communicate:
Whew, glad my rule of thumb (âit has more râs than you think. No, moreâ) succeeded!
I forgot to mention âJohnâs Fire Witch,â whose brevity inspired the IFComp.
Genuinely shocked that nobodyâs mentioned In the End.
Memory is fuzzy, but Iâd say it was Jigsaw that really kicked off Inform as a platform for ambitious, Infocom-scale games. Curses was ambitious, but Jigsaw demonstrated that Inform (5/6) was a reliable system for more than the game it was built around.
After Jigsaw we got Theater, Spiritwrak, So Far, Christminster, Windhall Chronicles, and the rest of the âearly Informâ wave.
Itâs also worth mentioning SPAG, sub-Q, and other shorter-lived online zines about IF.
Also not joking when I say that Iâm not sure there was a single more defining series of moments than those which took place decades before the first mainframe was built: when Lewis Carroll was putting pen to paper.
Not only is there an astounding amount of directly-lifted-from-Carroll games peppered throughout IFâs history, but the scene itself has always been lousy with his imagery and âvocabulary.â
Graham Cluley (better known now as an occasional talking-head cybersecurity expert) made two DOS text adventures, Jacaranda Jim and Humbug, which will always be definitive for me. I was a little too young to âgetâ the Infocom games first time round, and if I were introduced to the Cluley games now Iâd probably enjoy them while rolling my eyes at their self-conscious wackiness, but in my early teens they absolutely hit the sweet spot.
I also hadnât played enough IF, or read enough community chatter, to know that arbitrary instant deaths, inventory limits, arcane puzzles, and invisible doors of opportunity constantly closing permanently behind the player were Bad Things; years later, when I started writing IF, I had to train myself out of those habits.