Viv Dunstan's ParserComp 2022 playing notes

[vivdunstan]

Of Their Shadows Deep by Amanda Walker

Wow. That was just beautiful. I don’t want to say too much to spoil the experience, but it was lyrical, magical, emotional and beautifully implemented. Very player friendly with good hints. The textual play with ASCII graphics was excellent, but also described well in words in the text, so I think people who can’t see the graphics shouldn’t be missing out.

I just loved it. Thank you to the author!

A couple of minor suggestions for any post-comp release:

It would be good to code a response to STROKE CAT gets a similar response to TOUCH CAT, rather than the current “That’s not something you want or need to do.” I would also recommend adding some sort of response to things like THREAD RIBBON THROUGH WORDS which I tried, and got a “You don’t see that here.” response. Obviously I couldn’t take that shortcut, and had to do things in steps. But might be nice for a post-comp release if the game catches this and similar player attempts.

P.S. It only took me 20 minutes to play through. I rattled on quite happily and didn’t get stuck, apart from one HINT early on.

[AmandaB]

Thank you so much for this lovely review. I’m so happy you liked it! And your suggestions for the post-comp release are much appreciated.

[heasm66 (Henrik Åsman)]

I made a transcript of the walkthrough for The Euripides Engima if you, or anyone else, want to access it outside ADRIFT.

TEE_Walkthrough.txt (4.2 KB)

[vivdunstan]

Things that Happened in Houghtonbridge by Dee Cooke

Just played and enjoyed this very much. It’s a mystery set in England, with a detailed story to uncover, as well as good use of typical parser based puzzles.

I was particularly impressed by the writing. The world is rich and the story deep to uncover. There is a lot there! Best of all the story is well integrated with the puzzles and world.

I particularly liked the smooth implementation of things. For example if I’m carrying multiple keys UNLOCK DOOR would try them all. Similarly the character needs to drive from location to location and that is very smoothly and intuitively handled. Likewise the conversations are very well implemented. The hints system is also well implemented and friendly, and thank you to the author for providing a walkthrough.

I have a few minor points re tweaks to make in any post comp release. Plus also comments for puzzles I found particularly tricky. I will put those in a spoiler section at the end.

But yes, basically a great fun parser game, with good puzzles, strong story to uncover, and intuitive implementation. Thanks!

Notes for the author:
Maybe add more aliases for putting out the bonfire. Eg I tried PUT OUT BONFIRE without success.
I loved that when I took the ladder into the car the game automatically put the ladder on the roof. Magically smooth implementation! Though I did have serious doubts about carrying the ladder down from the attic
It would be nice if GET PIPE worked as well as UNSCREW PIPE if you have the wrench. I had to go to the walkthrough.
The timing for the locking other patient door was really tricky to get it right, even though I knew what to do.
And aarrgghh re the field maze! Though yes it did feel very Alice in Wonderland esque. Which was a nice touch.

[dee_cooke]

Thanks so much for your review and for your helpful notes! I’ll make those tweaks in the post-comp release

[vivdunstan]

Uncle Mortimer’s Secret by Older Timer

Just had fun playing this one. I’m a Mac user but couldn’t use the Mac version provided because it needs too new MacOS for me. However I was able to get the Windows version running under CrossOver. I suspect it would also work under Wine.

It’s a home brew system and it was a little exasperating as someone who benefits from much larger fonts not to be able to change the font size. However the font size wasn’t too bad for me, especially at the low zoomed in resolution I run. So I was able to play ok. Though I don’t know if the game would work for blind people using screen readers. I did like the sound effects.

The parser is pretty good but had some exasperations. Lots of things were unimplemented, with an apology from the author. But the main bugbear I had was how things in containers or on objects were handled. I might just have typed EXAMINE X to see what was in it and be told there is a Y. But if I tried to GET Y or EXAMINE Y it wouldn’t work and would tell me I couldn’t see Y, even though it had just told me all about it. I had to type GET Y FROM X. That got quite exasperating quite quickly.

However that aside the game was a fun timey-wimey adventure with some really neat gameplay mechanics. I especially liked the time travel aspects, though I wasn’t so keen on another device you had to use (the transmuter, for changing keys).

I did rely on the walkthrough when I was stuck. There were a few puzzles I got extremely stuck on and I think need more clueing. There was also quite a reliance on number/letter puzzles throughout. There was definitely a feel of an old school text adventure game. Which I rather liked.

Thanks to the author for providing a good in-game hints system as well as a walkthrough.

I enjoyed this a lot. I think some things could have been smoothed, but I found it an entertaining 90 minutes or so play and would certainly recommend it to others.

Notes for the author:
I initially tried 1589 for the Armada but then thought of going back a year. I do like how the machine deals with you if it’s not an accepted year.
The computer code clue near the end was too hard and needed more clueing. This is something most players had only seen right at the start of the game and would have forgotten. Add more of a hint from Uncle Mortimer re this, or from what Watson and Crick say.
It was a little exasperating that Watson and Crick both gave identical responses. They seemed like twins! Add differences.
I totally missed the cube in King John’s time. I only got to it thanks to the walkthrough and the hints. Something that important shouldn’t be so easily missable.
The Whitechapel section needed more content I think. It felt very unimportant apart from getting the dagger. Add another NPC or something for more interaction. Eg a policeman patrolling that you try to show the handkerchief to but ignores you.

[vivdunstan]

October 31st. by P/o. Prune

Just played through this and had fun. It’s a very old style parser game, with a spooky house, and lots of mysteries to uncover. A nice use of place, and puzzles, and NPCs that you run into.

On the downside I ran into a lot of hunt the verb/command issues. I’m going to list some of them at the end in a spoiler-hidden note for the author. So I did have to resort to the walkthrough. Thanks for including that. And thanks too for the in game hints, though I sometimes found these sparse, and had to go to the full walkthrough to see what to do. There were also an awful lot of doors to open, which got a bit exasperating.

The best thing for me was the spooky atmosphere. Ghostly figures that would flit in and out of view. And a growing sense of unease. It was well done.

The puzzles I liked too, but it was hampered a bit for me by the hunt the commands issue. However it was enjoyable.

For anyone wanting a spooky game do check this out. It would have been a very strong entry for ECTOCOMP!

Notes for the author:
In the attic OPEN EAST DOOR doesn’t open the chamber door, but the attic door which isn’t to the east. I needed to use the walkthrough to find out how to open the door I wanted.
As I commented in the review there were so many doors that needed to be opened. Often to the east! It got a little exasperating after a while.
I struggled a lot with the screw and keyhole puzzle. Eg I’d try PUSH SCREW IN KEYHOLE and PUSH SCREW INTO KEYHOLE. The also unsuccessful PUT SCREW IN KEYHOLE got the response “The screw can’t fit inside the keyhole at the moment.” Please add more alias options. Again I had to go to the walkthrough to find out exactly what to type here.
The padlock was another issue. I tried BREAK PADLOCK or HIT PADLOCK. It was a bit exasperating to find PULL PADLOCK worked. Maybe help players by allowing others.
At the very end please allow STAKE DRACULA. Stake is definitely a viable verb in this case! Thanks.
I really liked a lot of the puzzles. Especially the witch/cauldron one and geting into the hidden parts of the library. And the mouse one. Thanks!

[vivdunstan]

Gent Stickman vs Evil Meat Hand by AZ

Wow. This is different! A parser game with virtually no text on screen and hand drawn graphics instead. Which work remarkably well, for a very bare bones game.

On the downside it is brutally difficult, more so than I like. And getting the in-game hints fully displayed was a bit excruciating to step through.

However it made me laugh. And I was especially impressed at the getting past the chasm puzzle, where the series of pictures displayed had me on tenterhooks, wondering if my character would safely make it through! Thankfully yes.

I can’t remember ever seeing anything like this before. So kudos to the author for a very original game. I just wish it had been less brutally hard, and the hints less painful to access.

[OldTimer]

All good points, and I’ll implement most of them. Unfortunately, as I’ve said to others in the past, the parser was developed about 40 years ago (although it has grown a bit since) and the problem with having to TAKE [item] FROM [container] is built-in. While I can fully appreciate this being an irritation, I couldn’t alter it without a complete re-write, and as I’m pushing 80 this just isn’t going to happen . I presume you discovered that you can use F1 + {RETURN] to partially get round this.

As regards King John, at least you can return to get the cube from Runnymede, but it was only later that I realised if you hadn’t noticed King John mentioning ‘Eagle DNA’ at the time there was no way you could return to get the information (unless you happened to be scripting). I’ll also have to think of a way get the player to pay particular attention to this. Maybe John could write something and leave it before he exits the tent.

I always like tinkering with “completed” games, and your comments have given me something to get my teeth into.

Many thanks.

[vivdunstan]

@OldTimer

I presume you discovered that you can use F1 + {RETURN] to partially get round this.

Nope, and as a Mac user I have to jump through some hoops to properly enable function keys. So this isn’t something I tried.

Glad the review was useful!

[vivdunstan]

The Impossible Stairs by mathbrush

This is a traditional parser text adventure game written in Dialog. It is a sequel to The Impossible Bottle game.

I liked a lot about this. The implementation is generally very smooth. Without wanting to give too much away it’s a spatial-temporal puzzle, where you try to complete a list of tasks, and scurry around from place to place trying to accomplish them.

As such it uses a very compact geography, but one that expands. It’s possible to tackle puzzles in different orders, but some things need to be done before others can be completed.

I did find the balance between the puzzles slightly uneven, in that there are a big set of puzzles to complete later (at least as I played it), which were much more involved than early on. On the one hand that could be a nice learning curve for a novice parser player. But it did feel somewhat unbalanced to me.

Best of all I found it to be a sensitive musing on family relationships, change over time, and loss. My dad died a couple of months ago, not suddenly, but after a long illness. And I am still grieving. So there were aspects related to that in the work that I could strongly connect with. In a good way.

I wasn’t quite sure about the very ending, where one choice leads to a winning outcome. I’d like to see it wrapped more automatically. Because by that stage you’ve surely won.

And kudos for the big reveal re one character (Rob). When my brain realised what was happening it was an “Aha!” moment.

The in-game hints were helpful. I did have a few minor disambiguation issues (I am playing the latest download version). But nothing major. And thanks to the author for providing a walkthrough, which I always appreciate.

Definitely recommended.

[OldTimer]

All the suggestions in your Notes have been implemented. John now hands you the cube, and the clue to the next timeline is in the canister found in the barn. If you ask Crick some questions he will pass you on to Watson, and vice versa. Also, when you ask Crick about Mortimer he mentions that Mortimer kept going on about snapdragons. The policeman (a good idea I thought) is now present, though he doesn’t do much .

Obviously I had to re-write some of the hints and the walkthrough.

I haven’t uploaded the new version as I don’t think that’s allowed before judging ends.

[vivdunstan]

@OldTimer

All the suggestions in your Notes have been implemented.

Thank you very much!

[vivdunstan]

Improv: Origins by Neil deMause

Just played this, which is a brutally tough parser game. There are almost no built-in hints, and if it hadn’t been for Dan Fabulich’s Invisiclues I’d have given up in frustration.

It’s especially frustrating because the puzzles are good - the core challenge is to open a safe, but there is so much more to do to get to the end successfully. And the writing is good and amusing. But I was constantly battling the parser, having to find exactly the right phrasing to make things work. There was also often a need to repeat the same thing over.

I think this could be a strong game if the parser coding was improved to catch more variant commands. And if in-game hints were added. At the very least a walkthrough. Because there’s only so much fun I can get out of banging my head repeatedly against a parser and tricky puzzles without help Thanks again to Dan for the invisiclues, without which I would have given up in frustration.

So yes, some great ideas, and what could be a really good game. But it needs to be more user friendly. Not in a making the puzzles easy kind of a way. But to reduce the frustration.

[vivdunstan]

Desrosier’s Discovery by Ben Ehrlich and Isabel Stewart

This game is a curious mix of parser and choice. There’s a key section where the choice you make dictates what happens after. The writing was so entertaining that I replayed a lot of times to try out other options. Though with a custom engine and no SAVE/LOAD facility it was a bit laborious to replay.

The writing is amusing, but much of the game isn’t implemented enough. Many things I tried would get the response “Undefined response”. Which was exasperating. There was also a bit of a hunt the verb, and different responses to EXAMINE and SEARCH. Which has a logic to it, but can end up annoying a player. Especially on their umpteenth replay …

However as I say the multiple endings were very amusingly written. Particular praise for a couple (the Father Angus one - bagpipes! - and also the not-Scooby Gang). And it’s credit to the game that I wanted to replay like this. I don’t usually.

But it would be a better game if more responses were implemented, and also if a LOAD/SAVE facility was added. Because when you’re making a key choice repeatedly at a specific point it would be appreciated not having to replay up to that point every single time.

But fun! Thanks.

[vivdunstan]

Cost of Living by Dorian Passer and Robert Sheckley

I believe this is an interactive fiction version by Dorian Passer of a story written in 1952 by Robert Sheckley. The main interface is to type in words to fill in blanks in sentences. It’s not a parser game for me, but more like an Eliza type program, responding to particular words. In a clever way yes, but not a parser.

I ran into some problems with the interface. I run my Mac on a zoomed in low resolution. It’s 1024x640 resolution. I also run my Firefox browser with a pretty large font. When playing the game online I found text would vanish off the central section and I had to scroll to read that. With two big bands down the sides.

The next hitch I ran into was with one of the first boxes I typed a word into. The word I wanted to type was “blanks”, but the game insisted I type “blank” or something else. Mmm. Later on I wanted to type “thinking” into another box but the game wouldn’t let me.

As the story went on I enjoyed it, but it did feel like a choice based interactive fiction with overly long sections to read in between interactive places. I’m not keen on this, and always comment about it in reviews of choice games that do this. If I wanted to passively read a long story I’d choose to do that. I want a higher proportion of interaction versus story text.

Typing words into blanks felt very similar to some other input mechanisms for web based interactive fiction. For example Texture where you drag words, or other systems where you can cycle through word options. Often I felt that what I was typing was predictable. But the good thing is I did feel as though I was in the role.

However whose role was I in? The piece works at a variety of levels, and I wasn’t sure who two of the participants were (Harris and Vesper). However I could relate to the family situation depicted in the story, and I tried to understand how those characters felt when giving my answers.

Frustratingly the piece either ended prematurely for me or ended unclearly. In the last big chunk of text the final piece I had was “It would have been great to be a rocket pilot, to push a button and go to Mars.” but that was the end. And I couldn’t tell if it had just finished abruptly, or if I’d hit a bug.

So in conclusion I quite liked the interface, even if it’s not parser for me. But I found the chunks of text between interaction were far too long. And I was rather puzzled by some of the meta level bits. But I had fun trying it out.

[vivdunstan]

Looking ahead to the last week of judging it’s very likely I might not manage to play any more games before the end. Bearing that in mind I’d like to thank all the authors of the games I’ve played, and also all the authors of the games I haven’t. Sorry I didn’t get to yours! Partly due to time and energy limits with my neurological disease. Partly due to technical problems running some of the games, especially some of the Windows ones, which I couldn’t persuade CrossOver to run on my Mac.

I have very much enjoyed the variety and ingenuity of the entries I did play. All have given me fresh ideas about interactive fiction, including things that I want to feed in to improve the games I write myself.

I am sad however that some games still have relatively few ratings. If I may make a plea for more players of one game in particular, it’s Uncle Mortimer’s Secret, which I found a delightful old school parser game that sees the player gallivant through time, encountering lots of historical characters and having adventures. It is generally well implemented, very creative, and has comprehensive hints and a walkthrough. I got it running on my Mac under CrossOver. Happy to give fellow Mac folk tips on how to do that if you can’t run the provided MacOS version which only works on MacOS Monterey.

Anyway thanks again so much! It’s very likely I’m going to have another neurological downturn in September or October. So I may not be able to actively participate as a judge and reviewer in IFComp. But ParserComp has given me such a buzz. Thanks all.

[AmandaB]

Thanks so much, Viv! It’s such a gift to authors and the community for you to take the time and effort to write these reviews.

@vivdunstan

I am sad however that some games still have relatively few ratings.

I want to echo this. There is one week left in ParserComp, and there are currently 160 ratings, 30 short of an average of 10 ratings per game. And there are still five games with 5 or fewer ratings. This cannot stand, y’all. Please take some time this week to play and rate some games.

[DorianPasser]

This is a super helpful review! Thank you so much, Viv! And thank you for my second rating on IFDB, and all the other ratings that you left there for the ParserComp works that you played!

---

I’m so sorry that you also had accessibility problems! You’re the second person that let me know that they had issues with the text being cut off. Next time, I’m going to do better about this accessibility problem. Again, sorry about that and thanks so much for letting me know.

[aschultz]

Thanks for doing so much, Viv! Your work is very much appreciated. And it’s nice to have a recommendation. I want to get to all the games, but UMS seems particularly promising.