Is there a way to make “Understand as a mistake” comply with the rule that extensions must have lettered responses in named rules?
I’ve tried something like this
Understand "asdf" as a mistake ("Response goes here" (A)) (this is the whatever rule).
which results in this compiler error:
If it’s not possible, should it be, and where does one make this sort of feature request?
No, an understand line is not a rule. Only rules can contain marked responses.
You could write
Understand “asdf” as a mistake ("[asdf-response]").
To say asdf-response: follow the asdf-response-rule.
This is obviously awkward and awful, so it’s worth a feature request (if there isn’t already one).
Thanks. I’ve put a request on uservoice.