It’s your fault I entered in the first place. You were a superb cheerleader. If it places well at all, you get the credit.
Hold my beer for a sec and I’ll show you underconfident.
It’s your fault I entered in the first place. You were a superb cheerleader. If it places well at all, you get the credit.
Hold my beer for a sec and I’ll show you underconfident.
Heh, thanks!
-Wade
Perhaps it will be like the opening scene in Putney Swope: A corporate board must vote for the next CEO but no one may vote for himself. They elect the least likely candidate because everyone says to himself, “No one is going to vote for that guy.”
– Jim
I predict Goat Game will rank significantly higher than 27th. No reason other than that it seems more accessible than some of the games listed above it.
In particular, even though it’s a two-hour game pretty much every reviewer who’s played it will have finished one thread even if they don’t finish the entire game.
In the spreadsheet, I’m interested to see Silicon and Cells rank so closely to my own entry but not surprised since they are both standalone games with sci-fi themes.
Not seeing any top 10 predictions for The Best Man, which completely blew me away and is a very serious candidate for entering my top-20-of-all-time. Curious! I’m awaiting the results with bated breath. (I didn’t play enough of the games to give a serious ranking of my own.)
It was one of a handful that just missed the cut for me. I put it in the top 10 of games I didn’t test. Part of a reason it lost my IFComp-predictive tiebreaks is, it didn’t have a Certifiable Shiny Hook, just a lot of good parts. We all say we don’t grade on shiny hooks/quick laughs/what’s popular right now, and while I think most of us minimize it, I think the bias towards something exciting and eyecatching still slips through.
That’s not to say exciting and eyecatching and funny and just plain fun should be put down, especially when it’s clearly well-executed. It’s just, I had TBM in that very upper pool and suspected people might just say “Well, entry X was more fun” which might nudge TBM out.
Just rereading it I had a lot of “neat, I missed that” moments which bode well for its long-term durability. I filed it as something that would grow on people.
I hope the author gives a postmortem as to how much they had Aiden’s character nailed down and how much they wanted to leave that up to the reader.
My goodness–I didn’t know this movie even existed, but now that I’ve read its plot and brief overviews, I very much want to see it.
Yeah, as Andrew said, I really liked The Best Man - I gave it the single 10 in my rankings - but thought it wouldn’t resonate as strongly with the overall pool of judges given the well-known biases of what tends to do well in the Comp. Who knows, though - especially with authors’ votes counting this year, that conventional wisdom could be wrong!
Wow, I hope I do place 35th… Or better yet, I hope 36th place bc then I can be DEAD CENTER in the middle haha!
Purely based on the amount of chatter, I’d say 4x4 Archipelago and A Paradox Between Worlds are going to sweep the top two positions.
If the votes tallied total hours played on any given game, 4x4 would easily win, hands down.
Okay, I’ve updated the prediction spreadsheet with the actual results. The correlations are pretty high! It’s interesting to see which games over- or under-performed from the predicted results.
Interestingly, for the rank correlation with the actual ranks, the IFDB rank was better than ranking based on the linear regression score. But they’re pretty close, and all very high, at >0.9. And my “vibe check” predictions had the highest rank correlation lol.
Ah sadly I did not get my dream of dead center, but I GUESS 18th is pretty good too lol.
Thanks to everyone who voted btw!
So I got 37th place, lower than I was hoping but fair enough. But ouch, only 16 ratings total…the download-only nature of the game really harmed Cygnet Committee’s visibility.
Re: other people’s games, I’m glad that SpamZapper got in the top 10 and glad to see that Goat Game ranked a bit higher than projected (22nd instead of 27th).
(Cross-posted from another thread)
As a fun statistic, here are some of the most underrated games from the predicted rankings:
Edit: for comparison, the average difference between the actual and predicted ranks was 6.7.
Some other observations:
The Libonotus Cup is a hybrid of parser and choice. Brilliantly.
Woo woo! Underdogs!
More random facts because I love doing data analysis for fun:
The average number of ratings per game is 47. This is higher than 2020 or 2019 (both at ~43) but lower than 2018 (54). This is despite IFComp having fewer entries this year than in 2018, and the fact that we allow authors to vote. I’m not sure what is happening here. Are there fewer judges overall, or are judges rating fewer games, or both? This is a worrying trend!
Development systems: of the systems with at least two games, Choicescript had the highest average score, at 7.19, followed by Adventuron at 6.85, Inform 7 with 6.46, Quest with 6.36, Twine at 5.79, Ink at 5.32, and Unity at 4.51. Games labeled as “Custom” had an average score of 6.2, but this doesn’t include a lot of actual custom systems (listed as Java, C, Python, etc). This is on the spreadsheet under the 2021_results table. I haven’t checked previous years, but I suspect Choicescript is consistently the highest-rating common non-parser system. Then again, it’s a sample size of 12 games total.
Just a quick note that the “system” entries for “Dead Account” and “Wabewalker” seem to be switched at the moment; “Dead Account” is listed as Java, “Wabewalker” as Twine, but it should be the other way round.
(Since they have the same score, it doesn’t really affect the statistical evaluation in that regard, but I thought I’d mention it.)
@Oddy, I’ll trade you 36th for 18th LOL.