The link may not show up if you’re not logged in, but you can open it in an incognito window and see the full list of games.
6 Likes
We’re at 11 ratings per game now and not even halfway through. Well done all. I think I can still add 15.
Projections only do so much good, and this isn’t a scientific one but if we consider the # of reviews varies as the square root of the number of days, that’d put us roughly at 11*(sqrt31/13)=just under 17 reviews per entry, which seems really really good and a bit ahead of last year. (16.7).
And that’s with Iron CHIF going on simultaneously!
5 Likes
I’ve been super busy but slowly working my way through some 
One thing I noticed, is some of the lowest rated games require downloads which is probably putting people off (especially if playing on mobile.) Not sure what system they’re using, if they can also host an online playable version? (Might not be possible depending on the system though.) For some like “grind exceedingly small” I don’t know what I need to play it. (Downloaded but obviously don’t have the right program to run it.)
4 Likes
QTads.
EDIT: I’ve now added a sentence mentioning this to the pages for my comp games, Thank you for the reminder. :)
3 Likes
As I always said, I don’t mind much about numbers, but 11 judges per games is a really nice number.
I mean, the more the merrier, but a jury of 11 people per games seems already like a very safe “low” to have, and we have more than 15 days yet
3 Likes