Cloak of Darkness 2: Survey Results

[Laroquod]

@Campbell

You have completely misunderstood my point. The way I read that, the Or relates to the former part of the first statement (Dave had trouble understanding), not the fact that there are multiple ways of doing things. My point was highlighting the latter part of the sentence given Dave’s comments above, and therefor the Or (which essentially reiterates the latter part of the first statement) is completely irrelevant. Yes, Or yes, if you like.

I agree that what the ‘Or’ refers to is ambiguous, and could be interpreted the way you have, but the way you quoted it, removes that ambiguity, so I felt it was (perhaps unintentionally) an unfair quote. Have you considered that duodave might not have actually meant what you thought he meant? Shouldn’t we just assume that duodave’s views are self-consistent, if they can be read that way? Wouldn’t that make more sense?

[Campbell]

Fair enough, it wasn’t meant to be a misrepresentation, just an interesting contradiction.

[duodave (David Good)]

Touche, Campbell.