I didn’t say that. I do think we’re less different than the people who want to make money off us would have us believe. To what extent do I think we’re different? I have no fixed viewpoint on this, and I doubt I ever will, because it’s a hugely, wildly difficult topic. I think gender biology is fascinating, and I used to teach a segment of a Bio course on it, but anything I teach today will likely be in dispute in a year or two.
[Discussion of trans-athletes removed by Mod as previous]
Back to the topic at hand:
I read books by male authors all the time, and I’ve ben sitting here a while, thinking about male authors and their tendencies regarding writing about romance, feelings, and relationships.
Extremely well-known male authors:
William Shakespeare. The undisputed king of romance, feelings and relationships (RFT from here on out). Nora Roberts has nothing on this guy. Arguably the most “feelsy” writer of all time.
Stephen King. The undisputed dark prince of RFT. Love and sex and marriage and divorce; messy interpersonal relationships, family dysfunction, lots of inner monologue, messy and complicated feelings all over the place.
John Grisham. Wow, does this guy write about feelings and relationships. Not so much romance, but it’s definitely there.
JRR Tolkien. A little soft on the romance, although it’s there (what’s more romantic than Aragorn and Arwen?). Super, major, extremely heavy on the feelings and relationships.
Lee Child. Heavy on the romance, light on the feelings. Lots of very intense relationships that last exactly one book long each time before he leaves. These books are the “guysiest” books I can think of, and they’re still full of relationships and romance.
I could go on. Honestly, I can’t think of how a book without feelings or intense human relationships of some kind would be interesting to anybody. That book would look like a list of errands or a person passed out alone in a room, the end. I am failing to see how women do this more, or differently, or how RFT are female topics.