minor request for Dynamic Objects by Jesse McGrew

Jesse, could you add a note in the (blessedly concise) documentation that overriding the printed name property of classes that’ll be cloned is particularly important, otherwise the RELATIONS testing command will misleadingly say that the prototype object is always related to itself despite this not being true? Cloned objects, even objects of type “object” and lacking a printed name property, will borrow the prototype’s name as the printed name, leading your users (me) on a wild goose chase about “why aren’t relations being set correctly?”

Thx, and thx again for the easy extension.