This is absolutely valid, and I did consider including a blurb in the original post, but decided against doing this. I wasn’t trying to be coy, just… I think I weighed conveying the nature and size of what I was asking for more than the story itself. I think if I incorporate others’ advice into my overarching strategy and subsequently have a narrower request for testers and feedback, I will almost certainly include a blurb (and possibly more). So, I still appreciate this perspective.
I think this indeed will be something I’ll keep an eye out for. I appreciate this suggestion.
I think I probably overstated this part in my original post, because, you are correct about this. The main crux of what I was trying to convey was just that the overarching structure of the story is sort of there, but it still feels unwieldy, and it’s been difficult to reconcile that against the way I’ve envisioned the implementation. The point is well taken here though.