[code]“playit” by Andrew
room 1 is a room. the awesome video game is a thing in room 1. the vending machine is a thing in room 1.
rule for supplying a missing noun when playing: now noun is the awesome video game.
rule for supplying a missing noun when examining: now noun is the vending machine.
chapter playing
playing is an action applying to one thing. understand the command “play” as something new. understand “play [something]” as playing.
carry out playing:
the rule succeeds.
test disamb with “play/x”
[/code]
But here I don’t play the game or examine myself as expected.
I’m confused as to why this doesn’t work. I can use a “does the player mean playing the awesome video game: it is likely” rule in the example above, but I simplified the code from what’s in my source, which chooses a missing noun.
Is there any way to use this relatively simpler code? What am I missing?
I’m using 6G95 but this allears to fail in 6L as well.
Thanks!