Developing a new conversation extension

I just had a second look at this. I think the problem is that all of those implicit-actions include what would be the second noun in the full action. You can’t write a rule for supplying missing noun when your grammar line already has one noun in it, can you?

Or do you cheat by writing a rule like this?

Understand "ask about [any known thing]" as quizzing it about.

For supplying a missing second noun when an actor quizzing something about:
	Now the second noun is the noun;
	Now the noun is the interlocutor of the person asked.

Hey… I think that works!

How would that work with DPMR, though? Don’t they run before supplying a missing noun rules? It would be difficult to write things like this:

A person has an object called the favorite subject. Does the player mean quizzing someone about the favorite subject of the noun: It is very likely.