A lot of the material seems to be an anthology of IFComp rather than “learning” per se. So perhaps, as suggested, there is more than one book here.
Alternatively, the IFcomp essays could be reworked to be more oriented toward learning from what worked and what didn’t from entries. Which feels similar but slightly different from reviews.
I wonder if it would feel a little more cohesive if the extra essays were first, and then the year by year ones. That way you could see how Brian’s schemas work themselves out over the history of these comps.
Of the additional essays, I find the Best Puzzle / Big Games / Design Decisions sections really interesting, as well as the Conversational Systems and Opening subsections of the existing Sherlock Holmes section.
this would be interesting. I’ve seen many essay collections organized chronologically so you can see the progress of an essayist’s framework over time!
Thanks for everyone’s feedback! I’ve decided to keep the ‘extra’ essays and put the conclusions about xyzzy and ifcomp first before their respective sections.
I’ve finished going through and ‘polishing’ about 60% of the book (all of the XYZZY and IFComp essays that were there in 2017). I just need to finish Spring Thing (short) and the remaining essays. Once that’s done, I’ll add in my most recent ifcomp essays and add citations. Then, new essays on each XYZZY winner since Birdland and the last couple IFComps. So you’ll probably see those in the coming weeks. I’m trying to finish before the 24th of July if possible, and if not then then by August 14th, so they may come at inconvenient times.