6M62 no.verb oddness

[Zed (Zed Lopez)]

@severedhand

@otistdog

EDIT: Out of curiosity, how are you defining implicit-action?

I think @Zed put this together for me. Normally I note these things in the source but I haven’t in this case.

Heh. I think it was actually @otistdog who put that together for you.

Is there a way to get Inform to react in both its ways to the same nounless action?

How about something like the following? Attacking Rules which yields: >[1] attack You break the target apart with your bare hands. >[2] attack You mash the apple to pulp. >[3] attack What do you want to attack? >[4] boulder You'd rather keep your hands intact. >[5] me I didn't understand that sentence. >[6] attack boulder You'd rather keep your hands intact. >[7] attack What do you want to attack? >[8] darkness I don't see any such target. Try again. >[9] me Um, no. >[10] attack What…