Quick update: even though this review had only 1/3rd “helpful” votes, the author actually responded to it! He said he initially didn’t realize the offending content was an issue, and took it out of the game. I think this reaffirms that (a) new authors are open to changes, and (b) even mostly “not helpful” reviews can still have an impact. I’m not some crusader against AI art, but I’m glad the author read my comment and decided to look into it more on his own volition.